Jul 16, 13:55
linkedin_author_expansion
seo
medium
58.2
processed
How the top 1% of SEO founders are doing AI SEO.
Workflows, agents, shortcuts, automations, rules:
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/andrey-soloviev_how-the-top-1-of-seo-founders-are-doing-activity-7479840524892401664-RDwi?utm_source=combined_share_message&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAGnjYh8BS9fABVGN_pY_pxAAw51tK1JtvKo
While the provided content cuts off after the first point, the premise of moving away from basic ChatGPT prompts toward structured site rulebooks and workflows is the exact right approach. Sibonix should locate the full post to analyze the remaining six tactics. Building these structured rulebooks into our AI agent systems will give our clients a massive edge over competitors using basic prompting.
Read full content
How the top 1% of SEO founders are doing AI SEO.
Workflows, agents, shortcuts, automations, rules:
Most people paste a URL in ChatGPT, ask "how's my SEO?" and think "I'm AI native". You're not, sorry...
The top 1% set up 7 things most founders never touch:
1/ A site rulebook
Ideas (2)
Implementing a structured 'site rulebook' to guide AI content generation rather than relying on generic, single-prompt URL analysis.
We will build a structured JSON-based 'Site Rulebook' defining exact brand voice parameters, keyword mapping, and internal linking constraints for a mock SaaS brand. We will then run two content generation tests—one using Claude 3.5 Sonnet guided by this rulebook, and one using a standard ChatGPT prompt with just a URL—and compare the alignment and SEO-readiness of the output drafts.
before_after_comparison
moderate
— Requires drafting a structured JSON rulebook schema, running two API-based generation tests, and formatting the output comparison.
Moving from manual prompt-and-paste SEO audits to automated multi-agent workflows that run programmatic site checks.
We will build an automated workflow in Make.com that triggers when a new URL is published, crawls the page using an Apify scraping agent, evaluates the HTML against a target keyword list using GPT-4o, and automatically pushes structured optimization tickets directly to a Slack channel. We will record a walkthrough of this live agent pipeline executing end-to-end.
live_workflow_walkthrough
substantial
— Requires configuring a multi-step Make.com scenario, integrating Apify, setting up OpenAI API assistants, and building the Slack notification payload.
Jul 16, 13:55
linkedin_author_expansion
seo
medium
58.2
new
🚨 BREAKING: Reddit threads are dominating AI Search rankings right now.
ChatGPT cites them. Perple
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/andrey-soloviev_breaking-reddit-threads-are-dominating-activity-7475132067698319360-WNvM?utm_source=combined_share_message&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAGhj1BoB0uFfUiVqLl94jeduD-07ABoFfnY
The provided content cuts off right as the author begins to explain their strategy, making it too thin to extract a concrete, actionable method. However, the trend highlighted—that ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews favor Reddit threads over standard service pages—is highly critical. Sibonix must monitor this shift and investigate Reddit-focused content strategies to keep our clients visible in AI search results.
Read full content
🚨 BREAKING: Reddit threads are dominating AI Search rankings right now.
ChatGPT cites them. Perplexity cites them. Google AI Overviews quote them word for word.
Your service page? Not even in the consideration set.
Here's exactly how i'm REVERSE-ENGINEERING Reddit to win AI ci
Ideas (0)
Not yet ideated.
Jul 16, 13:55
linkedin_author_expansion
seo
low
33.2
new
DON’T ignore LLM SEO in 2026.
I've compiled 100 High-Intent AI Search Prompts that people are typin
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/andrey-soloviev_dont-ignore-llm-seo-in-2026-ive-compiled-activity-7467903537713303552-0lms?utm_source=combined_share_message&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAGhj1BoB0uFfUiVqLl94jeduD-07ABoFfnY
The provided content is too thin to extract immediate actionable steps, as it cuts off mid-word and does not include the actual list of 100 prompts. However, the warning that brands will become invisible if they fail to optimize for ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Claude search results is a critical trend. Sibonix should investigate these high-intent AI search queries to ensure our clients' brands remain visible in LLM-driven search results.
Read full content
DON’T ignore LLM SEO in 2026.
I've compiled 100 High-Intent AI Search Prompts that people are typing into ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Claude right now.
These AI tools answer questions without sending users to websites.
If you're not optimized for AI search results, you're invisib
Ideas (0)
Not yet ideated.
Jul 16, 13:55
linkedin_author_expansion
seo
medium
58.2
new
7 workflows that run your SEO & AI SEO
Rankings, AI citations, decay alerts: all on a schedule.
Wh
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/andrey-soloviev_7-workflows-that-run-your-seo-ai-seo-rankings-activity-7481309085590708224-XUS6?utm_source=combined_share_message&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAGnjYh8BS9fABVGN_pY_pxAAw51tK1JtvKo
The provided content is too thin to evaluate all seven workflows, but automating daily checks for ChatGPT, Perplexity, and AI Overviews mentions alongside Search Console is a highly valuable concept. Sibonix should build an automated agent to track these AI citations and rankings daily for our clients. We must retrieve the full LinkedIn post to analyze the remaining six scheduled workflows.
Read full content
7 workflows that run your SEO & AI SEO
Rankings, AI citations, decay alerts: all on a schedule.
What each workflow does while you're not looking:
1/ Checks rankings AND AI mentions every morning
Pulls Search Console, then checks if ChatGPT, Perplexity, and AI Overviews mention
Ideas (0)
Not yet ideated.
Jul 16, 13:55
linkedin_author_expansion
seo
low
33.2
new
GOODBYE manual SEO.
Claude + Google Search Console just ended the grind ↓
Most people use Claude t
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/andrey-soloviev_goodbye-manual-seo-claude-google-search-activity-7477701849320660992--CnP?utm_source=combined_share_message&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAGnjYh8BS9fABVGN_pY_pxAAw51tK1JtvKo
The author claims that integrating Claude with Google Search Console automated 95% of their routine SEO workflows, moving far beyond simple tasks like writing meta descriptions. However, because the provided content cuts off abruptly at the start of the list, the text is too thin to extract any actionable steps or understand how the system actually functions. Sibonix cannot act on this specific snippet without retrieving the complete, uncut post to analyze the actual workflow steps.
Read full content
GOODBYE manual SEO.
Claude + Google Search Console just ended the grind ↓
Most people use Claude to write meta descriptions.
That's just 1% of what Claude can do.
Last month it ran 95% of our routine SEO workflows on autopilot.
Here's what the system actually does:
1. Joins
Ideas (0)
Not yet ideated.
Jul 16, 13:55
linkedin_author_expansion
ai_marketing
medium
58.2
new
AI Search has grown 527% year-over-year.
More and more people now ask ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemi
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/andrey-soloviev_ai-search-has-grown-527-year-over-year-activity-7473691183488258049-dyMU?utm_source=combined_share_message&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAGhj1BoB0uFfUiVqLl94jeduD-07ABoFfnY
With AI search exploding by 527% year-over-year, relying solely on traditional Google SEO is a losing strategy. Sibonix must immediately audit whether our clients' brands are actually being recommended by ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini. Since most brands are currently invisible in these AI answers, we have a massive opportunity to help our clients dominate this new search channel before their competitors wake up.
Read full content
AI Search has grown 527% year-over-year.
More and more people now ask ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini for recommendations before they ever hit Google.
The only question is whether your brand is in the answer — or your competitor is.
Most brands have no idea. They're invisible
Ideas (0)
Not yet ideated.
Jul 16, 13:55
linkedin_author_expansion
seo
high
83.2
processed
The AI SEO Plugin is ready.
25 skills + a /bootstrap command to get your brand ranked by ChatGPT, P
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/andrey-soloviev_the-ai-seo-plugin-is-ready-25-skills-activity-7476240668458401792-foCL?utm_source=combined_share_message&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAGnjYh8BS9fABVGN_pY_pxAAw51tK1JtvKo
This free AI SEO plugin offers an immediate way to optimize brand visibility across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews using a bootstrap command. For Sibonix, securing this tool is a priority to analyze its 25 built-in skills and see how we can integrate these LLM-ranking tactics into our own client delivery stack. The concrete next step is to download this free plugin and run the bootstrap command on our own brand to test its effectiveness.
Read full content
The AI SEO Plugin is ready.
25 skills + a /bootstrap command to get your brand ranked by ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Google AI Overviews.
The same stack we use before, during, and after every client engagement.
Yours for FREE ↓
Without it, Claude doesn't know you
Ideas (7)
We are stress-testing the new AI SEO plugin on Sibonix to dissect its 25 skills before integrating them into our client delivery systems.
We just downloaded the new free AI SEO plugin to run the bootstrap command on our own brand.
linkedin_post
LLM optimization is replacing traditional SEO, and we are auditing this new tool to automate how clients rank in Perplexity and Claude.
If Claude and Perplexity do not know your brand exists, your traditional SEO stack is failing.
carousel
We are analyzing the 25 built-in skills of the new AI SEO release to build these LLM-ranking tactics directly into our AI agent systems.
We are auditing all 25 skills in the new AI SEO plugin to see which ones actually rank you in Gemini and ChatGPT.
short_video_script
A specialized '/bootstrap' command within the AI SEO plugin designed to instantly format and prepare brand data for indexing by LLM engines like Claude, ChatGPT, and Perplexity.
We plan to download the plugin, run the '/bootstrap' command on the Sibonix brand domain, and record a screen walkthrough of the step-by-step configuration. We will show the exact markdown and structured schema payload generated, then upload it to a clean Claude Projects knowledge base to verify how it immediately alters Claude's retrieval behavior regarding our brand.
live_workflow_walkthrough
A suite of 25 distinct built-in optimization skills targeting Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) across platforms including Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews.
We will build a side-by-side comparative matrix selecting two key skills from the plugin—specifically the citation-source generator and the LLM-intent alignment skill. We will run these optimizations on a test client page and show a before-and-after comparison of how Perplexity cites the page's content when answering industry-specific queries.
before_after_comparison
A `/bootstrap` command within the AI SEO plugin that automatically initiates brand optimization designed to get a brand recognized and ranked by major engines like ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews.
We will download the free AI SEO plugin, execute the `/bootstrap` command targeting the Sibonix brand domain, and record a walkthrough of the exact optimization assets and markdown files it generates. We will then show how these generated files are structured to feed LLM crawlers.
live_workflow_walkthrough
moderate
— Requires downloading the plugin, setting up an environment to run the command on our domain, and recording the output files.
The tool's 25 built-in skills designed to solve the problem of LLMs like Claude failing to recognize or recommend your brand.
We will run a series of baseline brand-awareness queries about Sibonix across Claude, Perplexity, and ChatGPT, document the gaps in their knowledge, apply the plugin's recommended schema and markdown optimizations to a test page, and then compare the LLMs' responses after prompting them with the newly optimized context.
before_after_comparison
moderate
— Requires running baseline queries, deploying the plugin's output to a live test URL, and using LLM reading tools to compare the before and after responses.
Jul 16, 13:55
linkedin_author_expansion
ai_marketing
high
83.2
processed
Your competitors are currently STEALING your leads...
(all because they own LLM visibility)
And th
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/andrey-soloviev_your-competitors-are-currently-stealing-your-activity-7472957202601943040-yE4O?utm_source=combined_share_message&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAGhj1BoB0uFfUiVqLl94jeduD-07ABoFfnY
Although the source text is truncated, it highlights a critical shift: competitors are stealing leads by dominating LLM visibility while brands remain stuck optimizing only for Google. For Sibonix, the immediate next step is to audit our clients' current visibility within AI search tools and develop a structured optimization framework to ensure they are recommended as top options. We must treat LLM optimization as a core, high-priority service to keep our clients from losing market share to AI-optimized competitors.
Read full content
Your competitors are currently STEALING your leads...
(all because they own LLM visibility)
And that’s not an exaggeration.
While you're still optimizing for Google, AI tools are:
- Shaping the entire category narrative without you
- Recommending your competitors as the “top
Ideas (2)
Competitors are securing high-intent leads by optimizing their brand footprint to be recommended as top-tier solutions by AI search engines like Perplexity and ChatGPT Search.
We will build an automated LLM Share-of-Voice auditing agent using Python and the Perplexity API to query 50 industry-specific buyer intent prompts. The workflow will parse the responses to generate a comparative visualization showing how often our client is recommended versus their competitors, alongside the exact sources cited by the LLM.
live_workflow_walkthrough
moderate
— Requires Python scripting, Perplexity API access, and a structured query list, taking roughly 3 to 4 hours to build and run.
AI tools shape the overarching industry category narratives and define market standards without direct input from brands that neglect LLM optimization.
We will run a narrative alignment audit by querying Claude 3.5 Sonnet on emerging category definitions, map the LLM's synthesized narrative against our client's core messaging, and build an optimization plan targeting high-authority index sources (like Reddit and niche industry wikis) to force a narrative correction.
before_after_comparison
moderate
— Requires querying multiple frontier LLMs, mapping brand messaging docs, and about 3 hours of analysis to draft the narrative injection blueprint.
Jul 16, 13:55
linkedin_author_expansion
ai_marketing
medium
58.2
new
9 Claude workflows we run weekly for AI Search
Audit, structure, create, measure, repeat 👇
Audit
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/andrey-soloviev_9-claude-workflows-we-run-weekly-for-ai-search-activity-7470067887307735040-B0W_?utm_source=combined_share_message&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAGhj1BoB0uFfUiVqLl94jeduD-07ABoFfnY
The provided content is too thin and cuts off mid-sentence, preventing a full evaluation of all nine workflows. However, the core idea of running weekly Claude workflows to audit brand visibility and citation signals across LLMs is highly valuable. Sibonix should locate the complete post to reconstruct these specific AI search auditing agents.
Read full content
9 Claude workflows we run weekly for AI Search
Audit, structure, create, measure, repeat 👇
Audit
1/ AI Visibility Agent
Scans ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity & Gemini, surfaces where you're invisible
2/ Citation Signal Auditor
Pulls your AI mentions, validates what the models a
Ideas (0)
Not yet ideated.
Jul 16, 13:54
linkedin_author_expansion
ai_marketing
high
83.2
processed
𝐁𝐢𝐠 𝐀𝐧𝐧𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 🎉
Launching BuildWire.AI.
For 15+ years I ran B2B marketing at E
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/rananjayraj_%F0%9D%90%81%F0%9D%90%A2%F0%9D%90%A0-%F0%9D%90%80%F0%9D%90%A7%F0%9D%90%A7%F0%9D%90%A8%F0%9D%90%AE%F0%9D%90%A7%F0%9D%90%9C%F0%9D%90%9E%F0%9D%90%A6%F0%9D%90%9E%F0%9D%90%A7%F0%9D%90%AD-launching-activity-7480620827802193920-7C4Z?utm_source=combined_share_message&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAGhsAoYBjYCTB5mL2W-F96Uuxpw_PDaXBxE
BuildWire.AI is launching to solve the exact gap Sibonix targets: bridging the divide between marketing strategy and technical AI automation using tools like n8n and Claude. Their three-pronged focus on autonomous marketing workflows, AI license adoption, and optimization for AI search engines (ChatGPT/Perplexity) directly validates our agency's core thesis. We must analyze this positioning to ensure our own AI agent systems and done-for-you marketing services remain highly competitive.
Read full content
𝐁𝐢𝐠 𝐀𝐧𝐧𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 🎉
Launching BuildWire.AI.
For 15+ years I ran B2B marketing at EY, Michelin, and Hitachi Vantara. In April I left to build with AI full time.
Since then, a version of the same conversation keeps happening. A founder tells me they know AI could save their team 10+ hours a week. They've already bought the tools. Then comes the quiet admission: nothing is actually wired up.
The automation people they talked to didn't understand marketing, and the marketing people didn't understand automation.
That gap is exactly where I've been living. Building full time has looked like this so far:
→ Selected into Hyperagent's Founding 500
→ A newsletter with a growing subscriber base
→ A growing audience across LinkedIn, X, YouTube, and Instagram
→ An AI learning app, live on the App Store
And underneath all of it: my newsletter, research, and content pipeline run on n8n, Hyperagent and Claude Agents I built myself. Some of them have been running since before I quit my job.
That's the same kind of system BuildWire now builds for marketing and growth teams. The work is mostly three things:
1. Marketing automations that keep running without you babysitting them
2. Getting your team actually using the AI licenses you're already paying for
3. Making your brand show up when buyers ask ChatGPT or Perplexity instead of Google
I'd rather start with honest conversations than a polished sales page.
If you've been putting off setting any of this up, or you know someone who has, my DMs are open. No pitch on the first call.
And if you're not sure where to start: name the most repetitive thing your team did this week. That's usually the first thing worth automating.
Ideas (7)
Most brands fail at AI adoption because they try to force their existing marketing team to become technical automation engineers.
Buying Copilot or ChatGPT licenses for your marketing team will not automate your marketing.
linkedin_post
The real bottleneck in modern marketing is the gap between the people who write strategy and the machines that execute it.
Marketing agencies that do not build their own proprietary AI agent systems are already obsolete.
carousel
Optimizing for Perplexity and ChatGPT requires a continuous, high-volume content loop that only autonomous AI agents can maintain.
Your brand is invisible on Perplexity because your content team is still writing for Google 2022.
short_video_script
Autonomous marketing automations built on n8n and Claude that manage content pipelines without requiring constant human monitoring.
We will build a live n8n workflow that monitors a Google Drive folder for raw content briefs, routes them to a Claude 3.5 Sonnet agent to generate structured social media copy, and automatically stages them in Buffer, showcasing the exact error-handling and routing logic that keeps the system running autonomously.
live_workflow_walkthrough
Optimizing brand visibility on conversational search engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity to ensure a brand is recommended during buyer research.
We will build a comparative audit showing how a brand is currently cited in a Perplexity query for 'best B2B marketing automation tools' versus its visibility after we implement structured entity data and comparison landing pages, mapping the exact citation sources Perplexity crawls to generate its answers.
before_after_comparison
Autonomous marketing and content research pipelines built on n8n and Claude that run continuously without manual babysitting.
Build an active n8n workflow that monitors industry RSS feeds, uses a Claude API agent to filter for trending topics, automatically drafts a newsletter section in a Google Doc, and pings a Slack channel for final approval. We will record a live workflow walkthrough of the canvas running in real-time to show how the logic steps execute.
live_workflow_walkthrough
moderate
— Requires setting up an n8n cloud account, configuring Claude API credentials, and mapping the data nodes to Google Docs and Slack (approx. 2-3 hours).
Optimizing a brand's digital footprint so it is actively cited and recommended when buyers search on conversational AI engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity.
Create a before-and-after comparison showing how a brand's visibility changes in Perplexity. We will query Perplexity on a specific B2B software category, document the initial citations, implement a structured schema and digital PR update on a test site, and then record the updated Perplexity query showing our brand now appearing in the cited sources.
before_after_comparison
substantial
— Requires deploying optimized site schema, indexing the test pages, waiting for LLM crawler cycles, and running comparative queries over 1-2 weeks.
Jul 16, 13:54
linkedin_author_expansion
ai_marketing
medium
58.2
new
I publish 4x/week on LinkedIn. Newsletter every Monday. YouTube twice a month. Twitter threads daily
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/rananjayraj_i-publish-4xweek-on-linkedin-newsletter-activity-7475186007609458690-m8st?utm_source=combined_share_message&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAGhtqnkBlAH9R4sBJ5YIgAmHDEXmcztJvdk
This system proves that a single operator can maintain a high-volume, multi-channel presence by offloading mechanical tasks like research aggregation and drafting to Claude. For Sibonix, the immediate next step is to comment 'SYSTEM' on this LinkedIn post to secure his setup guide and checklist. We should then audit our own organic social workflows to see if we can replicate this zero-dollar tool stack to scale our output.
Read full content
I publish 4x/week on LinkedIn. Newsletter every Monday. YouTube twice a month. Twitter threads daily. Just me. Here's my complete content system:
For a long time I assumed going solo meant lower output. Turns out the limit wasn't effort. It was the process.
So I stopped automating the creativity and started automating the process. Claude handles the mechanical work: research aggregation, first drafts, performance analysis, repurposing. I keep the parts that are actually mine: strategy, personal stories, final edits, replying to people.
The full loop is in the visual below: Plan, Create, Ship & Learn. 9 skills, one calendar, one newsletter, $0 in tools.
What used to need a content team now runs on a Monday morning and a Friday review. I've been running it for a few months and the quality has held.
Want the complete setup? Comment "SYSTEM" and I'll send it.
Includes the system setup guide and the weekly checklist.
Ideas (0)
Not yet ideated.
Jul 16, 13:54
linkedin_author_expansion
seo
medium
58.2
new
6 hours of backlink analysis. 45 minutes in Claude Cowork. 41 winnable links.
I dropped three compe
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/rananjayraj_6-hours-of-backlink-analysis-45-minutes-activity-7483158469898911744-plat?utm_source=combined_share_message&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAGhsAoYBjYCTB5mL2W-F96Uuxpw_PDaXBxE
This is a highly practical execution of using Claude to compress a tedious 6-hour competitor backlink gap analysis into a 45-minute automated workflow. Sibonix should replicate this exact technique of feeding competitor exports into an LLM to identify high-topical-fit domains linking to multiple competitors and generate tailored outreach angles. The concrete next step is to build this specific prompt sequence into our SEO agent workflows to automate link-prospecting for our clients.
Read full content
6 hours of backlink analysis. 45 minutes in Claude Cowork. 41 winnable links.
I dropped three competitor exports into Cowork and asked it to find every domain linking to 2+ competitors but not to us.
What came back:
→ A ranked list scored by authority and topical fit (fit mattered more than DA)
→ Each link classified: editorial, guest post, broken link, or digital PR play
→ A suggested outreach angle per domain: which page to pitch and why they'd care
41 is what survived my manual check of the top 60. A few were dead sites or paid placements it couldn't detect. That check stays human.
I put the full process in a pack:
→ Step-by-step Cowork setup guide (which exports to pull, folder structure, what to click)
→ The exact instruction file I drop in with the exports
→ My scoring spreadsheet template with worked examples
→ 4 outreach angle frameworks, one per link type
Comment "BACKLINK" and I'll DM you the pack.
Follow me for more Cowork workflows I actually run, not demos.
Ideas (0)
Not yet ideated.
Jul 16, 13:54
linkedin_author_expansion
ai_marketing
high
83.2
processed
Most marketers pick one AI model and run everything through it.
That's quietly become the most expe
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/rananjayraj_aitools-artificialintelligence-aiproductivity-activity-7475903193130893313-J05P?utm_source=combined_share_message&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAGhtqnkBlAH9R4sBJ5YIgAmHDEXmcztJvdk
Relying on a single default AI model for all marketing tasks is a lazy habit that severely degrades output quality. Sibonix must audit its AI agent systems to ensure tasks are routed to specialized models—like Claude for long-form voice, Gemini for data analysis, and lighter models for high-volume routine work. Matching the specific job to the right model is the only way to maintain high-quality client deliverables.
Read full content
Most marketers pick one AI model and run everything through it.
That's quietly become the most expensive habit in their AI stack right now.
Not expensive in dollars. Expensive in output. You push a 40-page report through a fast creative model, or write subject lines with a heavy reasoning model, then blame "AI" when the result falls flat. The tool wasn't wrong. The match was.
I've been testing the current lineup across real work, and the gap between models is wide enough now that the job should pick the model, not your default habit.
Here's the map I keep next to me (June 2026):
→ Long-form writing & brand voice: Claude Opus 4.8. Holds a consistent voice across long documents.
→ Creative copy & general writing: GPT-5.5. Fast, strong on short-form and idea variety.
→ Reasoning & data analysis: Gemini 3.1 Pro. Leads on data, logic, and multimodal inputs like PDFs and decks.
→ Real-time research & trends: Grok 4.3 or Perplexity. Live web, current news, fast lookups.
→ Image generation: GPT Image 2 or Nano Banana 2. Creative visuals and on-brand graphics.
→ High-volume routine work: Claude Haiku 4.5 or GPT-5.4-mini. Cheap and fast for subject lines, product descriptions, and bulk drafts.
No single model wins everything. The job picks the model now, not the other way around.
Which job are you still running through the wrong model?
Like, Save & Reshare ♻️ with someone who is still using one model for everything.
#AITools #ArtificialIntelligence #AIProductivity #Claude #FutureOfWork
Ideas (8)
Building automated agent systems that route tasks to specialized models eliminates the human bottleneck of manually choosing the right tool.
Most marketing teams waste hours manually switching between different AI models.
linkedin_post
A single-model AI stack produces generic marketing assets that fail to convert.
The default AI model habit is quietly ruining your brand voice.
carousel
Sibonix audits and builds multi-model systems to ensure client deliverables leverage the distinct strengths of Claude, Gemini, and GPT.
If your marketing agency uses one AI model for everything, you are overpaying for average work.
short_video_script
Routing routing-specific marketing tasks to specialized models (such as Claude for long-form brand voice and Gemini for data analysis) yields significantly higher quality than relying on a single default model.
We will build a multi-agent workflow in n8n that splits a marketing campaign brief, routing the competitor data analysis to Gemini 3.1 Pro and the long-form copy generation to Claude Opus 4.8. We will then show a side-by-side comparison of this orchestrator's output against the output of a single default model running the entire prompt.
before_after_comparison
Using lighter, faster models like Claude Haiku or GPT-mini for high-volume routine work (such as bulk subject lines and product descriptions) maintains acceptable quality while optimizing speed and API costs.
We will build an automated bulk email variant generator using Claude Haiku 4.5 to process 100 product SKUs simultaneously. We will record a live walkthrough of the run, showing the real-time generation speed, the final copy quality, and the cost breakdown dashboard.
live_workflow_walkthrough
Matching specific marketing tasks to specialized models (such as Claude for long-form brand voice) produces significantly better outputs than relying on a single default model.
We will build an automated workflow in Make.com that takes a raw brand brief and routes it to Claude for long-form drafting. We plan to present a side-by-side comparison showing the resulting voice consistency and depth against the same brief run through a default generalist model.
before_after_comparison
moderate
— Requires setting up a Make.com scenario, API keys for both models, and a standard brand voice prompt template to run the test.
Gemini models excel specifically at complex data analysis and logical reasoning over multimodal inputs like PDFs and decks.
We plan to build a script that feeds a complex multi-page PDF marketing report into Gemini and record a screen walkthrough demonstrating its data extraction accuracy and analytical reasoning compared to a standard creative model's output on the same file.
screen_recording
quick
— Requires a sample multi-page PDF report, access to Gemini and alternative model APIs, and a basic comparison prompt.
Routing high-volume, routine tasks like bulk copywriting to lightweight, cheaper models maintains required quality while drastically reducing operational costs.
We will build a batch processing script that takes a CSV of 200 product SKUs to generate descriptions. We plan to show a live dashboard walkthrough tracking the processing speed, total API cost, and output quality of a lightweight model versus a heavy frontier model.
live_workflow_walkthrough
moderate
— Requires writing a batch processing script, setting up a simple logging dashboard to track cost metrics, and preparing a sample CSV.
Jul 16, 13:54
linkedin_author_expansion
ai_marketing
high
83.2
processed
OpenAI shipped 3 major releases in 48 hours.
Most feeds are covering them separately. They only mak
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/rananjayraj_open-ai-updates-activity-7481221137406930944-w14w?utm_source=combined_share_message&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAGhsAoYBjYCTB5mL2W-F96Uuxpw_PDaXBxE
OpenAI's release of GPT-5.6 with parallel agent execution and ChatGPT Work directly impacts how we build agent systems. Sibonix must immediately test these new models and the 'ultra' setting to verify OpenAI's cost-per-outcome claims before migrating any client workflows. The battle has shifted to agent UX, and we need to assess if ChatGPT Work's document and slide generation can replace our current tool stack.
Read full content
OpenAI shipped 3 major releases in 48 hours.
Most feeds are covering them separately. They only make sense read together.
𝐉𝐮𝐥𝐲 𝟖: 𝐆𝐏𝐓-𝐋𝐢𝐯𝐞. A new generation of voice models built on full-duplex architecture. It listens and speaks at the same time, waits when you pause, and hands hard questions to a frontier model behind the scenes while the conversation keeps flowing.
𝐉𝐮𝐥𝐲 𝟗: 𝐆𝐏𝐓-𝟓.𝟔. The new family (Sol, Terra, Luna) hits general availability. Pricing per 1M tokens: Sol $5 in / $30 out, Terra $2.50 / $15, Luna $1 / $6. Plus an 'ultra' setting that runs four agents in parallel on one task.
𝐉𝐮𝐥𝐲 𝟗: 𝐂𝐡𝐚𝐭𝐆𝐏𝐓 𝐖𝐨𝐫𝐤. An agent mode that pulls context from your tools and files, shows you the plan, then delivers finished docs, sheets and slides. Desktop today for all plans.
The way I read it: one launch per layer. Model (5.6). Interface (Live). Workflow (Work).
Three things stood out to me:
1. The pricing is the headline. OpenAI is competing on cost per outcome now, not benchmark bragging rights. Worth noting the benchmark numbers are OpenAI's own reported figures, so test before you migrate anything.
2. Voice just became a plausible work interface. Full-duplex is the difference between a demo and something you could actually run a briefing with.
3. ChatGPT Work is a direct answer to Claude Cowork. The agent race has moved from models to UX.
Full breakdown in the carousel. What's the first workflow you'd hand over to an agent mode like this?
Ideas (9)
We are stress-testing OpenAI's new 'ultra' parallel agent setting to verify their cost-per-outcome claims before migrating any client marketing workflows.
OpenAI claims its new parallel agent setting cuts cost per outcome, but we are not migrating client workflows until we run the stress tests ourselves.
linkedin_post
We are auditing ChatGPT Work's document and slide generation to see if it can genuinely replace our specialized agency tool stack.
ChatGPT Work wants to replace your marketing tool stack.
carousel
The AI bottleneck is no longer the underlying model strength but how fluidly the interface handles multi-agent execution.
Stop looking at GPT-5.6 benchmark scores.
short_video_script
GPT-5.6's 'ultra' setting that runs four agents in parallel on one task to optimize cost-per-outcome.
We will build a benchmark test using the GPT-5.6 API to run four parallel agents (configured as a researcher, strategist, copywriter, and editor) on a standardized ad campaign creation task. The plan is to measure the exact token usage and execution time, comparing this parallel 'ultra' run's cost and quality directly against a traditional sequential GPT-4o chain.
before_after_comparison
ChatGPT Work's agent mode that pulls context from local tools and files to generate finished documents, sheets, and slides.
We plan to connect ChatGPT Work to a Google Drive folder containing raw product spec sheets and brand guidelines for a mock client. We will record a video showing the agent analyzing the files, displaying its step-by-step layout plan, and generating a formatted 5-slide Google Slides presentation in real time.
screen_recording
GPT-Live's full-duplex voice architecture that listens and speaks simultaneously while handing off complex questions to a background frontier model.
We will build a voice-driven marketing briefing assistant using the GPT-Live API. The live walkthrough will show a user interrupting the assistant mid-sentence with a complex campaign ROI calculation, demonstrating how the voice pauses instantly, processes the math via the background model, and delivers the answer without breaking conversational flow.
live_workflow_walkthrough
GPT-5.6's 'ultra' setting which runs four parallel agents on a single task to optimize cost-per-outcome.
We will build a parallel marketing research workflow using the GPT-5.6 Luna model under the 'ultra' setting to analyze competitor ad strategies, running four agents simultaneously to compile a unified report, and compare its actual token cost and execution speed against our standard sequential GPT-4o agent workflow.
before_after_comparison
substantial
— Requires API access to the GPT-5.6 family, writing a parallel execution script, and setting up Helicone to track exact token spend.
ChatGPT Work's agent mode that connects to local files and tools to output complete docs, sheets, and slides based on a visible plan.
We will set up a live walkthrough where we feed ChatGPT Work a raw client brief and a campaign performance CSV, let it generate its multi-step plan, and record it outputting a formatted Google Slides presentation and budget sheet.
live_workflow_walkthrough
moderate
— Requires desktop access to ChatGPT Work, preparing a mock client dataset, and recording the end-to-end generation process.
GPT-Live's full-duplex voice architecture that listens and speaks simultaneously and hands off complex queries to a background frontier model.
We will record a screen and audio session testing GPT-Live as a real-time campaign briefing assistant, where we intentionally interrupt its speech with complex marketing math to show how it pauses, processes the handoff, and resumes.
screen_recording
quick
— Requires mobile or desktop access to the GPT-Live voice interface and a pre-planned script of complex interruptions.
Jul 16, 13:54
linkedin_author_expansion
ai_marketing
medium
58.2
new
How to build a competitor teardown in 30 minutes using Claude Cowork + Gemini (save this 8-step work
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/rananjayraj_competitorteardowncarousel-activity-7475536099667267584-O1WU?utm_source=combined_share_message&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAGhtqnkBlAH9R4sBJ5YIgAmHDEXmcztJvdk
This workflow condenses days of manual competitor auditing into a 30-minute pipeline using Claude Cowork and Gemini. Sibonix should immediately test this 8-step prompt sequence to speed up our initial brand teardowns for new clients. We must also comment 'Teardown' on the original post to secure the pre-built Claude Skills file and automate this asset extraction process.
Read full content
How to build a competitor teardown in 30 minutes using Claude Cowork + Gemini (save this 8-step workflow)
At EY, this used to take me 2-3 days. At Hitachi, 5-7 days.
Here's the workflow I run now, in under 30 minutes:
↳ 1. Open Claude Cowork. Create a new Project called "Competitor Teardown."
↳ 2. Drop in the competitor's last 10 blog posts, their pricing page, and any recent press releases (PDF or DOCX, straight into the Project folder).
↳ 3. Paste this prompt: "Read all files. Extract positioning, ICP signals, pricing tier logic, and content themes. Structure the output as a comparison matrix."
↳ 4. Switch the model to Opus 4.6 with Extended Thinking on. Give Cowork 3-4 minutes.
↳ 5. Ask a follow-up: "What are their 3 biggest positioning gaps compared to [your company]?"
↳ 6. Export the matrix as a .docx. If your team needs it in Google Docs, upload it to Drive and convert from there.
↳ 7. Screenshot the matrix. Drop it into Gemini with this prompt: "Turn this into a single-page executive briefing. Landscape orientation."
↳ 8. Download Gemini's visual. Send it to your CMO before the next campaign planning meeting.
If you're still spending days on a competitor brief, this is worth testing on the next one.
This is the manual version, useful if you're not on Claude Skills yet.
If you are, I've got the Claude Skills file that runs most of this teardown for you, prompts included. Comment "𝐓𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐝𝐨𝐰𝐧" and I'll send it over.
♻ Worth reposting if your marketing team still does these audits by hand.
Ideas (0)
Not yet ideated.
Jul 16, 13:54
linkedin_author_expansion
ai_marketing
medium
58.2
new
𝟖 𝐂𝐥𝐚𝐮𝐝𝐞 𝐒𝐤𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐬 𝐈 𝐰𝐢𝐬𝐡 𝐈'𝐝 𝐡𝐚𝐝 𝐢𝐧 𝐘𝐞𝐚𝐫 𝟏.
Something I've been noticin
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/rananjayraj_8-claude-skills-for-founders-ugcPost-7468319898646032384-1zIj?utm_source=combined_share_message&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAGhtqnkBlAH9R4sBJ5YIgAmHDEXmcztJvdk
This toolkit package of 8 structured Claude prompts offers pre-built frameworks for GTM strategy, brand voice, and campaign planning. Sibonix should engage with the post to acquire this toolkit and audit how these 'Claude Skills' are structured. Benchmarking these frameworks will help us refine our own AI agent prompts and client onboarding deliverables.
Read full content
𝟖 𝐂𝐥𝐚𝐮𝐝𝐞 𝐒𝐤𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐬 𝐈 𝐰𝐢𝐬𝐡 𝐈'𝐝 𝐡𝐚𝐝 𝐢𝐧 𝐘𝐞𝐚𝐫 𝟏.
Something I've been noticing: most founders discover these 6-12 months too late.
Here's what they're still doing manually:
• Writing pitch decks at 2am with no framework
• Answering "how big is your market?" with vibes instead of data
• Pricing based on what feels right at midnight
• Building GTM strategies on whiteboards that never become real plans
I spent a full weekend on my first pitch deck. Had zero methodology behind my market size numbers. Changed my pricing 4 times because it "felt off."
These 8 Skills would have saved me months.
They're not generic prompts.
They're structured Claude Skills - pre-built with frameworks, scoring models, and output formats that give you consultant-grade deliverables in under an hour.
I shared all 12 in a post back in February. This time I've curated it down to the 8 that matter most in Year 1:
1. Idea Validator
2. Market Sizing Calculator
3. Customer Research & Personas
4. Brand Voice Guidelines
5. GTM Strategy Builder
6. Pricing Strategy Optimizer
7. Pitch Deck Content Creator
8. Campaign Strategy & Planning
Swipe through the carousel - the before/after on each one is worth it.
Want all 8 ready to use in Claude?
1. Like this post
2. Comment 𝐅𝐎𝐔𝐍𝐃𝐄𝐑 below
3. Connect with me
I'll DM you the complete toolkit.
Curious: which of these do you wish you'd had earlier?
#ClaudeAI #AIForFounders #StartupMarketing #MarketingAutomation #GTMStrategy #AITools #Founders #ClaudeSkills
Ideas (0)
Not yet ideated.
Jul 16, 13:54
linkedin_author_expansion
ai_marketing
medium
58.2
new
Most professionals I talk to picked one AI model in 2024 and still run everything through it.
That
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/rananjayraj_most-professionals-i-talk-to-picked-one-ai-activity-7479897643285073921-qLM-?utm_source=combined_share_message&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAGhtqnkBlAH9R4sBJ5YIgAmHDEXmcztJvdk
Relying on a single AI model for every task is a quietly expensive habit because the performance gap between models is wider than ever. Sibonix should stop using a single-model default and adopt a multi-model routing approach, specifically segmenting tasks like long document analysis, strategy, and argument testing. The concrete next step is to review the author's matrix to audit how we route different tasks across our AI agent systems.
Read full content
Most professionals I talk to picked one AI model in 2024 and still run everything through it.
That habit is quietly expensive now. The gap between models on specific tasks is wider than it has ever been.
I've been running 6 models side by side for a few months. This matrix is what I actually use to decide, task by task:
• Long documents go to one model, hard strategy to another
• Anything whose answer changed this month never goes to a chat model
• One of these I use purely to attack my own arguments
• And 3 task types where model choice barely matters at all
The full breakdown is in the GIF. Zoom in, it's built to be saved.
Still refining this. If your experience with any of these disagrees with mine, I'd genuinely like to hear it.
And if someone on your team is still running everything through one model, this is probably the easiest way to show them why that's expensive. Re-share it their way.
Ideas (0)
Not yet ideated.
Jul 16, 13:54
linkedin_author_expansion
ai_marketing
high
83.2
processed
Your ad account is leaking money in places you never check. I built 15 free Claude Skills that find
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/rananjayraj_your-ad-account-is-leaking-money-in-places-activity-7476257968431497216-1Y8g?utm_source=combined_share_message&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAGhtqnkBlAH9R4sBJ5YIgAmHDEXmcztJvdk
This is a must-acquire resource for Sibonix since it offers 15 pre-built Claude skills specifically designed to automate paid ad tasks across Google, Meta, and LinkedIn. The concrete next step is to like, comment 'Ads', and connect with the author to get the free prompts and setup docs. We can directly analyze these workflows to improve our own AI agent systems and client delivery.
Read full content
Your ad account is leaking money in places you never check. I built 15 free Claude Skills that find it.
Running paid ads across Google, Meta, and LinkedIn used to eat 15+ hours a week. Across 8 client accounts.
Manual audits. Mining negatives. Picking apart creative. Building audiences from scratch. Writing copy that won't trip a policy review.
So I built the Paid Advertising Agent. 15 skills that talk to each other and work as one system.
𝐆𝐨𝐨𝐠𝐥𝐞 𝐀𝐝𝐬:
🔍 Performance Max Auditor → grades assets, recommends fixes
✍️ Copy Generator → compliant headlines, extensions, policy checks
📊 Search Terms Analyzer → winners, losers, patterns
⛏️ Negative Keyword Miner → finds wasted spend
📈 Performance Diagnostic → health check plus bid optimization
𝐌𝐞𝐭𝐚 𝐀𝐝𝐬:
🎯 Andromeda Auditor → catches Advantage+ mistakes
🧠 Audience Builder → targeting from customer data
📝 Creative Brief Generator → designer briefs from objectives
🔬 Creative Analyzer → scores your ads, explains what's working on Meta
𝐋𝐢𝐧𝐤𝐞𝐝𝐈𝐧 𝐀𝐝𝐬:
🎯 Audience Builder → job title and company targeting
✍️ Copy Generator → B2B tone plus briefs
🔬 Creative Analyzer → scores your ads, explains what's working specific to LinkedIn
𝗦𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗴𝗶𝗰 𝗣𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴:
📋 Media Planner → budget split, channel mix, KPI forecasts
🎯 Creative Testing Framework → A/B matrices with statistical rigor
📊 Insights Reporter → turns test data into design principles
For agencies on 5+ accounts, in-house multi-platform teams, consultants, and solo founders spending $2K+/month.
All 15 skills are free.
Want the complete Paid Advertising Agent?
1️⃣ Like this post
2️⃣ Comment "Ads"
3️⃣ Connect with me 🤝
I'll send all 15 skills, example prompts, setup docs, and a guide with examples.
Follow for more Claude Skills and AI automation workflows 🙂
Ideas (3)
A modular Claude-based agent system that coordinates specialized ad-platform 'skills' (such as Google Performance Max auditing and Meta Andromeda auditing) to analyze performance and generate assets.
We will build a prototype workspace in Claude Projects containing three core agent modules: a Google Search Terms Analyzer, a Meta Andromeda Auditor, and a B2B LinkedIn Copy Generator. We will feed it raw sample ad performance data and record a walkthrough showing how these distinct prompts interact to produce a cohesive cross-channel optimization report.
live_workflow_walkthrough
moderate
— Requires setting up a Claude Project, drafting three specialized system prompts based on the shared framework, and preparing mock ad performance data (takes ~3 hours).
An automated Google Ads negative keyword miner and search terms analyzer designed to identify wasted spend and recommend bid optimizations.
We will build a Make.com automation that connects a Google Sheet containing raw search term data to the Anthropic API. We will run an anonymized search term report through this flow to showcase a before-and-after comparison of the chaotic raw search queries versus the clean, categorized negative keyword list generated by the AI.
before_after_comparison
moderate
— Requires building a Make.com scenario, setting up the Anthropic API connection, and structuring a template Google Sheet for the input/output data (takes ~2 hours).
A Meta Ads 'Andromeda Auditor' that analyzes Advantage+ campaign settings and automatically outputs structured creative briefs for designers based on performance gaps.
We will build a specialized prompt in Claude that accepts screenshots of Meta Advantage+ campaign settings alongside ad creative performance metrics. We will record a screen recording showing the AI analyzing the inputs, identifying optimization mistakes, and generating a formatted markdown creative brief ready for a designer.
screen_recording
quick
— Requires drafting the system prompt, gathering a sample Meta Ads screenshot/performance metrics, and recording a brief video walkthrough of the execution (takes ~1 hour).
Jul 16, 13:54
linkedin_author_expansion
ai_marketing
high
83.2
processed
I tested every AI tool a solo founder/marketer might need. Here's the $60/month stack that actually
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/rananjayraj_aiformarketers-solofounder-claudeai-activity-7474823466362294272-z4-U?utm_source=combined_share_message&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAGhtqnkBlAH9R4sBJ5YIgAmHDEXmcztJvdk
This lean $60/month stack demonstrates that expensive subscriptions like Zapier, Perplexity, and OpenClaw are redundant when self-hosted n8n and Hermes Agent are utilized. Sibonix should immediately evaluate Hermes Agent as a secure, container-hardened alternative for self-hosted agentic workflows to avoid the security vulnerabilities of older tools. Additionally, we should audit our automation costs to ensure we are leveraging self-hosted n8n for unlimited free executions.
Read full content
I tested every AI tool a solo founder/marketer might need. Here's the $60/month stack that actually ships work.
No sponsorships. No "10 tools you NEED" listicle. Just what earns a seat on my card, what I run for free, and what I dropped after testing it properly.
The 3 I pay for ($60/month total, nothing more):
→ Claude Pro, $20/month: writing, Cowork automation, every Skill I've built, and Claude Code for scripts and quick fixes, all in one plan.
→ ChatGPT Plus, $20/month: Codex acts as a second-pair-of-eyes code reviewer on anything Claude Code ships, plus native image generation for ad creative and quick social graphics.
→ Google AI Pro, $20/month: Gemini lives inside Docs, Sheets, and Gmail. I use it for multimodal competitor breakdowns (video and image together) and campaign briefs I don't want to leave Workspace for.
The 6 I run free and haven't needed to upgrade:
→ Grok: free tier is capped at roughly 10 prompts every 2 hours, enough for quick X trend checks.
→ NotebookLM: free plan gives 100 notebooks and 3 audio overviews a day. Source-grounded research, no hallucination risk on facts I'd otherwise have to double-check.
→ Notion: the free plan. Full AI got moved behind the $20 Business tier this year, but I don't need it there, Claude already does that work.
→ Obsidian: fully free, no gated features. My swipe file and evergreen notes live here.
→ Hermes Agent: free, open-source, MIT licensed. Same self-hosted agent idea as OpenClaw, built with container hardening from day one.
→ n8n: self-hosted, free, unlimited executions. The plumbing connecting everything above.
The ones I dropped after testing:
→ Perplexity: a 2026 audit found a 37% error rate on its answers. Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini already cover research between them, paying $20/month for a fourth research tool stopped making sense.
→ OpenClaw: genuinely interesting open-source agent, but it wants shell and file access across your machine, it's 6 months old now, and it's already got a logged CVE rated 8.8 severity. Hermes Agent covers the same ground with container hardening built in, so that's the one in my free tier instead.
→ Lovable/Replit: solid for building actual apps, but Claude Cowork already covers the agentic work I need. Paying twice for overlapping capability didn't make sense.
→ Zapier and Make: both good products, both recurring costs for something n8n already does for free once it's set up.
Full breakdown (cost, free-tier ceiling, what each tool actually owns) is in the image.
Building this kind of stack and want help mapping it to your own workflows? That's the work I do.
What's in your stack that I missed?
#AIforMarketers #SoloFounder #ClaudeAI #MarketingAutomation #AIStack
Ideas (2)
Using self-hosted n8n to achieve unlimited free automation executions, bypassing the scaling costs of subscription services like Zapier or Make.
We will deploy n8n on a self-hosted cloud instance and build a marketing automation workflow that ingests social feeds, analyzes them with Claude's API, and updates Google Sheets. We will document the setup process and present a cost-benefit calculation comparing n8n's flat hosting fee against Zapier's pricing tier for 50,000 monthly tasks.
live_workflow_walkthrough
moderate
— Requires spinning up a cloud VPS, installing n8n via Docker, configuring API credentials, and building the multi-step test workflow.
Utilizing Hermes Agent as a secure, container-hardened, open-source agentic tool to safely execute local code and file operations without exposing the host system to CVE vulnerabilities.
We will draft a deployment plan to install Hermes Agent in a sandboxed Docker container, run a file-processing agent task, and explicitly show how the container configuration blocks unauthorized shell commands from escaping to the host machine. This will demonstrate secure local execution of AI-generated scripts.
screen_recording
substantial
— Requires installing Hermes Agent, configuring Docker security policies, writing a test agent command, and recording the execution and containment behavior.
Jul 16, 13:54
linkedin_author_expansion
ai_marketing
high
83.2
processed
Your AI writing sounds like everyone else's AI writing.
Not because your prompts are bad. Because t
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/rananjayraj_your-ai-writing-sounds-like-everyone-elses-activity-7482450749168476160-3Hme?utm_source=combined_share_message&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAGhsAoYBjYCTB5mL2W-F96Uuxpw_PDaXBxE
This 'brand voice card' is a highly practical asset for Sibonix to standardize client voices across our AI agent systems. Instead of relying on complex, fluctuating prompts, we should immediately build and implement this 8-line template for every brand we manage. This ensures consistent, non-generic output across ChatGPT, Claude, and any new tools we deploy.
Read full content
Your AI writing sounds like everyone else's AI writing.
Not because your prompts are bad. Because the tool has no idea who you are, so it writes toward the average of everything it has read.
I fixed this with a one-page "brand voice card".
Eight lines: what I do, who I talk to, my tone, the words I use, the words I ban, my formatting rules, and two real samples of my writing.
Now you paste it into any tool before you ask for anything. ChatGPT, Claude, Grok, the new stuff that launches next month. Same voice, every time.
A prompt is a one-time instruction. A voice card is an asset you build once and reuse forever.
I wrote the full breakdown as an article: the exact 8-line template, a filled example you can copy, the 3 ways to deploy it, and the one line that turns it into a final-pass quality check.
Full article linked in the comments.
What three words describe your voice? Drop them below and I'll tell you the one word I'd ban from your list.
Ideas (7)
We embed 8-line brand voice cards directly into the system prompt level of our AI agent systems to automate brand consistency without manual copying and pasting.
Stop pasting your brand voice guidelines into ChatGPT every time you need a post.
linkedin_post
Complex prompt engineering for brand voice is obsolete because a standardized 8-line asset keeps multi-agent systems aligned across different LLMs.
Your 1,000-word AI prompt is actually making your brand voice worse.
carousel
We run client campaigns across Claude, GPT-4, and Llama simultaneously by feeding them the exact same 8-line voice card as a system constant.
Claude and ChatGPT will never write the same way unless you give them the same 8-line guardrail.
short_video_script
Using a standardized, reusable 8-line 'brand voice card' (defining audience, tone, formatting, banned words, and samples) as a system prompt prefix to eliminate generic, average AI writing styles.
We plan to build a standardized 8-line Brand Voice Card in a Google Sheet for a B2B marketing client. We will then show a side-by-side comparison of a blog introduction generated by GPT-4o using a standard prompt versus one generated with the brand voice card prepended, highlighting how the card successfully filters out generic AI vocabulary and enforces strict formatting constraints.
before_after_comparison
Deploying a single, static brand voice asset across different LLMs (such as ChatGPT and Claude) to achieve identical stylistic and tonal outputs across platforms.
We will build a Make.com automation that pulls a JSON-formatted brand voice card from Airtable and feeds it as a system instruction to both Anthropic's Claude 3.5 Sonnet and OpenAI's GPT-4o. We will record a walkthrough of the workflow showing that both models produce cohesive, brand-aligned LinkedIn posts that respect the exact same constraints despite their different native architectures.
live_workflow_walkthrough
An 8-line brand voice card template that standardizes output style and tone consistently across multiple distinct LLMs instead of relying on complex, fluctuating prompt instructions.
We will draft a standard 8-line brand voice card for a sample B2B brand, then run a standard newsletter prompt with and without the card across Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4o, and Gemini 1.5 Pro. We will present a side-by-side comparison of the outputs to visually demonstrate how the card eliminates generic AI-isms and maintains consistency across all three models.
before_after_comparison
moderate
— Requires drafting a sample 8-line voice card, running 6 prompt iterations across three LLM interfaces, and compiling the comparative text outputs into a side-by-side visual layout.
Using the brand voice card as an automated, final-pass quality check to audit, score, and correct draft AI outputs.
We will build a Make.com automation workflow that takes raw, drafted marketing copy, passes it to a secondary LLM step programmed with the brand voice card as an evaluator, and record a walkthrough of the system automatically flagging banned words and reformatting violations in real-time.
live_workflow_walkthrough
substantial
— Requires building a multi-step workflow in Make.com, connecting OpenAI or Anthropic APIs, creating a draft with intentional voice violations, and recording the execution of the automated audit.
Jul 16, 13:54
linkedin_author_expansion
ai_marketing
high
83.2
processed
Claude Sonnet 5 shipped this week. It's now the default model across Claude.ai, Claude Code, and Cow
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/rananjayraj_claude-sonnet-5-shipped-this-week-its-now-activity-7478456555877740544-ShmH?utm_source=combined_share_message&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAGhtqnkBlAH9R4sBJ5YIgAmHDEXmcztJvdk
Claude Sonnet 5 is a massive upgrade for our AI agent builds, offering native agentic planning and a game-changing 1M-token context window. We must immediately leverage the discounted $2/$10 pricing through August 31 to automate manual workflows like competitor audits and campaign QA. The concrete next step is to migrate our marketing workflows to Sonnet 5 to process entire brand guidelines and campaign histories in single sessions.
Read full content
Claude Sonnet 5 shipped this week. It's now the default model across Claude.ai, Claude Code, and Cowork. Three things matter here if you're running any kind of AI automation in your business:
→ It's built to be agentic. Planning, tool use, browsers, terminals, running autonomously at a level that used to need a bigger, pricier model. That's the tier your marketing workflows probably live in right now.
→ Native 1M-token context window. That's not a spec bump, it's a different way of working. Full campaign history, brand guidelines, and competitor research in one session instead of chunking everything into pieces and hoping Claude remembers slide 3.
→ Pricing dropped to $2/$10 per million tokens through August 31. If cost was the reason you kept a workflow manual, that math changed this week.
I've been testing what this unlocks for a few automation workflows I run: reporting, competitor audits, campaign QA. The context window is the part that's actually changing how I set things up, not the speed.
Ideas (8)
Claude Sonnet 5's 1M-token context window eliminates the need for complex database integrations to keep AI agents aligned with brand guidelines.
Stop building complex retrieval systems just to keep your AI agents on-brand.
linkedin_post
The temporary pricing drop through August 31 makes running high-volume competitor audits mathematically negligible in cost.
Running daily competitor audits just became 80 percent cheaper.
carousel
Sonnet 5's native agentic planning allows us to deploy marketing systems that execute multi-step campaign QA without human intervention.
We are migrating our client QA workflows to Sonnet 5 to eliminate manual review bottlenecks.
short_video_script
Claude Sonnet 5 features a native 1M-token context window that can process entire brand guidelines, campaign histories, and competitor research in a single session without chunking.
We will build a workflow that feeds a brand's 500-page historical asset archive and complete style guide into a single Sonnet 5 session. We will show a walkthrough of the model auditing a new multi-channel campaign draft against this massive history to flag brand voice violations.
live_workflow_walkthrough
Claude Sonnet 5 includes native agentic planning, tool use, browser navigation, and terminal control to run workflows autonomously.
We will build an autonomous competitor auditing agent powered by Sonnet 5's tool-use capabilities. We will capture a screen recording of the agent dynamically planning its steps, opening a browser to extract pricing data from live competitor sites, and compiling a structured CSV analysis locally.
screen_recording
Native 1M-token context window that enables processing entire brand guidelines, competitor research, and full campaign histories in a single session without chunking.
We will build a workflow that ingests a massive 300-page brand repository (containing PDF brand guidelines, historical ad performance sheets, and competitor audits) into Claude Sonnet 5 and run a prompt to generate a new, fully aligned Q3 ad campaign strategy, showcasing how the model synthesizes all inputs without loss of context.
live_workflow_walkthrough
moderate
— Requires gathering ~300 pages of real brand/campaign documents, configuring the API connection, and recording the prompt execution and output quality.
Native agentic planning and tool use capabilities that allow autonomous execution of complex, multi-step marketing tasks like competitor audits.
We will build an autonomous research agent using Sonnet 5's tool-use API that takes a target competitor's homepage URL, plans its own navigation path, executes web-scraping calls to extract pricing and messaging, and compiles a structured competitive analysis report.
screen_recording
substantial
— Requires writing a Python script integrating Claude's tool-use API with a scraping/browser tool, debugging the agent's planning loops, and capturing the execution video.
Discounted $2 input / $10 output per million tokens pricing (through August 31), which shifts the economics of running high-volume manual QA workflows.
We will build a batch-processing script that runs automated brand compliance QA on 100 mock display ads, tracking the exact token usage and API costs under Sonnet 5's promotional pricing, and present a cost-benefit spreadsheet comparing it to manual labor rates.
before_after_comparison
quick
— Requires writing a simple API batch script, generating mock ad text, and building a cost-comparison sheet based on the $2/$10 pricing.
Jul 16, 13:54
linkedin_author_expansion
ai_marketing
medium
58.2
new
The 3-paste rule: if I've pasted a prompt 3 times, it becomes a Claude Skill.
I found 23 versions o
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/rananjayraj_the-3-paste-rule-if-ive-pasted-a-prompt-activity-7480997827288969216-TqeW?utm_source=combined_share_message&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAGhsAoYBjYCTB5mL2W-F96Uuxpw_PDaXBxE
Sibonix should immediately adopt this 3-paste rule to audit our Claude workflows and eliminate output drift. By converting prompts pasted more than three times into Claude Skills, we can ensure highly consistent, repeatable outputs that any teammate can reuse. The concrete next step is to review our active Claude projects, identify prompts used three or more times, and convert them into official Skills.
Read full content
The 3-paste rule: if I've pasted a prompt 3 times, it becomes a Claude Skill.
I found 23 versions of the same prompt scattered across my Claude projects last week. The same 400-word competitor summary, re-pasted and slightly tweaked every time. That's when I started counting pastes.
But paste count alone isn't the whole test. Before converting anything now, I run 6 quick checks:
Convert it when:
- You've pasted it 3+ times
- You keep tweaking the same lines
- The output has to stay consistent
- A teammate could reuse it
Keep it a prompt when:
- The task is exploratory
- The ask changes every time
Score 2 or more on the convert list and it's worth the 2 minutes. The whole test is in the animation, built to be saved.
What I didn't expect: the win isn't the time saved. It's that the output stopped drifting. Version 23 finally behaves like version 1.
Which prompt of yours fails this test right now? I'll guess most people have one they've pasted 10+ times.
Ideas (0)
Not yet ideated.
Jul 16, 13:54
linkedin_author_expansion
ai_marketing
high
83.2
processed
I cleaned up my Claude projects this week.
Buried in one folder were dozens of prompts I’d written
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/rananjayraj_i-cleaned-up-my-claude-projects-this-week-activity-7477707639188123649-bGZ6?utm_source=combined_share_message&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAGhtqnkBlAH9R4sBJ5YIgAmHDEXmcztJvdk
Stop wasting time copy-pasting repetitive prompts for positioning, ICP extraction, and hook testing. Sibonix should immediately convert these seven specific marketing workflows into permanent Claude Skills to automate our repeat work. The immediate next step is to comment 'SKILLS' on this post to secure the creator's pre-built Skill files and integrate them into our AI agent systems.
Read full content
I cleaned up my Claude projects this week.
Buried in one folder were dozens of prompts I’d written over the last year.
Most of them are gone now.
Not because they stopped working, but because I kept using the same ones until they became Claude Skills.
These are the seven prompts I still come back to.
1. The Positioning Audit
“You’re a senior strategy consultant. Read my website [drag files]. Identify the 3 positioning statements that are competing. Recommend which to keep.”
I rarely type this anymore. The Positioning Audit Skill handles it.
2. The ICP Extractor
“From this [interview transcript / LinkedIn bio / sales call notes], extract: their role, their pain, their desired outcome, and the 3 words they use to describe the problem.”
This became a Customer Research Personas Skill because I was using it almost every week.
3. The Hook Tester
“Here are 5 LinkedIn hook drafts. Rank them on (1) specificity, (2) stakes, (3) curiosity gap. Rewrite the bottom 3 to match the top 2.”
I still check the output, but the Virality Predictor Skill does most of the work now.
4. The Brief Compressor
“Here’s a 12-page campaign brief. Rewrite as a 1-page visual brief: objective, audience, message, 3 proof points, CTA.”
One thing I like is that it flags missing information instead of filling the gaps.
5. The Gap Finder
“Compare [competitor’s] positioning to [ours]. Where are they strong and we’re silent? Where are we strong and they’re silent?”
The Skill version also ranks which gaps are actually worth going after.
6. The Stakeholder Translator
“Rewrite this strategy doc 3 times: once for the CFO (focus on ROI and risk), once for the CEO (focus on growth and story), once for the board (focus on defensibility).”
The board version is automated. I still rewrite the CFO and CEO versions myself.
7. The Prompt Refiner
“I just asked you [prompt]. The output was [paste]. What information would have made your answer 10x better? Rewrite the improved prompt.”
Ironically, this prompt helped improve all the others.
Looking back, I don’t think I’ve become better at writing prompts.
I’ve become better at spotting repeat work.
If I find myself using the same prompt more than a couple of times a month, it’s usually a sign that it should become a Skill instead.
Comment SKILLS and I’ll send over the actual Skill files that replaces these prompts.
Like, save & re-share ♻️ with other marketers & founder who might need it.
Ideas (2)
Converting repetitive manual marketing prompts (like ICP extraction and positioning audits) into permanent Claude Project 'Skills' with system-level instructions to eliminate copy-pasting.
We will build a Claude Project pre-configured with custom 'Skills' for ICP extraction and positioning audits, upload a raw customer interview transcript and a competitor homepage, and record a screen walkthrough showing Claude instantly producing structured marketing assets without any manual prompting.
screen_recording
moderate
— Requires setting up a Claude Project, writing two system instructions, preparing real sample assets, and recording the execution (approx. 2 hours).
Implementing a self-optimizing 'Prompt Refiner' skill that analyzes a mediocre marketing output, identifies missing context, and automatically rewrites the prompt for a 10x better result.
We will run a basic LinkedIn hook generation prompt, pass its output through the Prompt Refiner skill to extract missing variables (stakes, specificity), and present a side-by-side comparison of the initial generic hooks versus the highly targeted hooks generated by the refined prompt.
before_after_comparison
quick
— Requires running two Claude prompt generations and formatting the resulting prompts and outputs into a clear comparative layout (approx. 1 hour).
Jul 16, 13:54
linkedin_author_expansion
organic_social
high
83.2
processed
LinkedIn started quietly cutting reach for AI comments in May. No warning, no notification. The acco
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/rananjayraj_linkedin-started-quietly-cutting-reach-for-activity-7481331403171942400-es69?utm_source=combined_share_message&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAGhsAoYBjYCTB5mL2W-F96Uuxpw_PDaXBxE
Sibonix must immediately audit all LinkedIn workflows and halt any automated AI commenting, DM replies, or connection notes to protect account reach from LinkedIn's quiet distribution cuts. We should restrict AI tools like Claude strictly to backend tasks like drafting from voice notes, researching hooks, and planning layouts. Moving forward, we must apply the author's exact test: if a user would feel differently knowing an interaction was automated, it must be done manually.
Read full content
LinkedIn started quietly cutting reach for AI comments in May. No warning, no notification. The account just stops traveling.
I automate about half my LinkedIn work with Claude. Here is the exact line I never cross, and the one test that decides it.
What I let Claude draft:
• First drafts of posts, from my own voice notes and analytics. I rewrite every one.
• Carousel and infographic layouts
• Research on what's working: hooks, formats, timing patterns
• Summaries of my week's comments and DMs so nothing falls through
What I never automate:
• Comments on other people's posts. If I didn't read your post, I have no business commenting on it.
• DM replies. People can tell. And the moment they can tell, you've lost them.
• Connection request notes. A templated "I love your content!" does more damage than no note at all.
• Anything posted without me reading it end to end first
The May crackdown made this a reach problem, not just a taste problem. Automated comments and generic AI replies now get flagged, and the account posting them loses distribution quietly.
But honestly, the algorithm just caught up to what readers already knew. A comment that could have been written by anyone, about any post, was never doing anything for you.
The test I use before automating anything: would the other person feel differently about this interaction if they knew a machine did it?
If yes, I do it myself.
Where do you draw the line? I suspect mine is more conservative than most, and I'd genuinely like to hear the counterargument.
Ideas (7)
We are pausing all automated frontend interactions on LinkedIn and shifting our AI systems strictly to backend research and drafting to protect client reach.
LinkedIn is quietly killing the reach of accounts using AI for comments and DMs.
linkedin_post
Our agency now applies a single rule for LinkedIn operations: if a prospect would feel cheated knowing an interaction was automated, we force it to be manual.
If your prospects knew an AI wrote your DM reply, would they still buy from you?
short_video_script
We rebuilt our LinkedIn system to ban automated engagement, redirecting Claude entirely to backend tasks like layout planning and voice-note transcription.
We just stripped all automated commenting and messaging out of our LinkedIn systems.
carousel
LinkedIn quietly cuts account reach and distribution when detecting automated AI comments, DM replies, and templated connection notes.
We will build a Make.com scenario that replaces fully automated LinkedIn outbound sequences with an approval-gated system. The workflow will pull incoming DMs via Phantombuster, feed them to Claude to draft a context-aware response, and send a Slack notification with 'Approve' and 'Edit' buttons so a human must manually copy and send the final message, keeping the account completely safe from algorithm flags. We will record a live walkthrough of this setup in action.
live_workflow_walkthrough
Using AI strictly for safe backend tasks, such as generating authentic first drafts of LinkedIn posts directly from a creator's raw voice notes.
We will build an automation that takes a raw, unstructured audio voice note, transcribes it using the Whisper API, and passes it to Claude 3.5 Sonnet. We will show a screen recording of the exact system prompt used to extract high-impact hooks and format the transcription into a polished, human-sounding LinkedIn draft and carousel layout without losing the creator's unique voice.
screen_recording
Utilizing AI strictly for backend drafting tasks—such as converting raw voice notes into structured LinkedIn post drafts and planning carousel layouts—to keep front-facing interactions entirely human.
We will build a Make.com scenario that takes raw mobile voice memos from a Google Drive folder, transcribes them using OpenAI's Whisper, and routes the transcript to Claude 3.5 Sonnet to output three distinct hook options and a slide-by-slide carousel layout. We will show a screen recording of the exact prompts used to preserve the speaker's natural voice and the final manual edits made to the draft.
live_workflow_walkthrough
moderate
— Requires configuring a Make.com scenario linking Google Drive, OpenAI Whisper, and Anthropic Claude APIs, taking about 2 hours to test and refine the translation prompts.
Halting automated front-facing LinkedIn activities (AI comments, DMs, and connection notes) to protect account distribution from quiet reach cuts by routing these tasks to manual human queues.
We will build a hybrid prospecting pipeline in Clay where outbound leads are researched and personalized hooks are drafted by AI, but instead of auto-sending them via LinkedIn automation tools, the workflow pushes these drafts into a manual review queue in Slack. We will show a before-and-after comparison of a fully automated sequence setup versus this human-in-the-loop validation pipeline.
before_after_comparison
moderate
— Requires setting up a Clay table with AI enrichment and configuring a webhook to push manual action items to a Slack channel, taking roughly 2 hours.
Jul 16, 13:54
linkedin_author_expansion
ai_marketing
medium
58.2
new
בניתי סימולציה של קבוצת מיקוד מבוססת AI. (אני קורא להם "סוכנים" כשאני רוצה להישמע חשוב, אבל בינינו,
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/or-ben-haimmm_%D7%91%D7%A0%D7%99%D7%AA%D7%99-%D7%A1%D7%99%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%9C%D7%A6%D7%99%D7%94-%D7%A9%D7%9C-%D7%A7%D7%91%D7%95%D7%A6%D7%AA-%D7%9E%D7%99%D7%A7%D7%95%D7%93-%D7%9E%D7%91%D7%95%D7%A1%D7%A1%D7%AA-ai-activity-7480598862202720256-M61t?utm_source=combined_share_message&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAGgye3IBjBVnADtgU6W7q2Tyl9efce8ooqw
The author's attempt to simulate an AI focus group failed because cheap, low-parameter models run on budget infrastructure caused the agents to hallucinate, freeze, and stubbornly refuse to change their opinions. For Sibonix, this is a clear warning that multi-agent persona simulations require robust, larger models and serious compute power rather than cost-cutting setups to avoid deadlocks. If we build agent-based market research systems, we must invest in proper infrastructure rather than under-provisioned Google Colab instances.
Read full content
בניתי סימולציה של קבוצת מיקוד מבוססת AI. (אני קורא להם "סוכנים" כשאני רוצה להישמע חשוב, אבל בינינו, זו פשוט מטריצה).
5 פרסונות שונות מתחילות בעמודה אפס. כל עמודה חדשה במטריצה היא עוד שלב שבו כולם עושים אינטראקציה עם כולם. שורה אחרי שורה, רואים איך הדעה של כל פרסונה מתפתחת. זה אשכרה האח הגדול של הדאטה.
הכל עבד. אבל אז האינטראקציה השתגעה.
הם פשוט איבדו את היכולת לשנות דעה. כולם נשארו תקועים במצב אפס עם רעש מינימלי. במקום קבוצת מיקוד חכמה, קיבלתי חמישה בוטים עקשנים שמסרבים להקשיב אחד לשני. (כן, גם אני חשבתי שזה יותר מדי דומה למציאות). פה ושם הם גם זרקו איזו דילוזיה מפורסמת של מודל שפה, רק כדי לוודא שאני ער.
מסתבר שתשתית קטנה ולא רובסטית פחות מתאימה פה. ניסיתי לחסוך. הבאתי מודל עם מעט פרמטרים. זרימה היא מילה יפה למה שקורה כשאתה לא יודע מה אתה עושה. ה-GPU פשוט הרים ידיים ומת.
עכשיו המסך קפוא. גוגל קולאב רוצים שאני אכניס אשראי כדי להמשיך. לפי התעריף שלהם, נראה לי שעדיף לתת להם כליה. (או כבד. למרות שלא בטוח שהם ירצו אותו).
שורה תחתונה: אי אפשר להשוות את זה לקבוצות מיקוד אמיתיות. הדבר היחיד שזה נותן זה לאמן את הסוכנים לפרסונות פעילות שכמה שיותר תואמות למציאות. קל להגיד. קשה לבצע.
בוט עם פנים גנריות ביחס לתמונה
Ideas (0)
Not yet ideated.
Jul 16, 13:54
linkedin_author_expansion
ai_marketing
medium
58.2
new
האם סוכן מבוסס מודל שפה (LLM Agent) יכול לשמש כתחליף לקבוצת מיקוד מסורתית?
המטרה היא לבדוק האם ניתן
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/or-ben-haimmm_%D7%94%D7%90%D7%9D-%D7%A1%D7%95%D7%9B%D7%9F-%D7%9E%D7%91%D7%95%D7%A1%D7%A1-%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%93%D7%9C-%D7%A9%D7%A4%D7%94-llm-agent-%D7%99%D7%9B%D7%95%D7%9C-activity-7453114455892168705-MKad?utm_source=combined_share_message&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAGgymj8BRYvwSJ_ah8Gf5Lt2SZlSs63CG6w
Using LLM agents to simulate diverse customer personas for market research is a highly relevant concept that aligns perfectly with Sibonix's focus on AI agent systems. We should explore building our own simulated focus groups to test client marketing messages, value propositions, and pricing objections. The concrete next step is to design a prototype workflow that compares simulated AI persona feedback against real-world performance data to test its predictive accuracy.
Read full content
האם סוכן מבוסס מודל שפה (LLM Agent) יכול לשמש כתחליף לקבוצת מיקוד מסורתית?
המטרה היא לבדוק האם ניתן להשתמש בסוכני AI המדמים פרופילי לקוחות שונים, כדי לנתח תגובות למוצרים, מסרים שיווקיים, רעיונות עסקיים וחוויית משתמש בצורה מהירה, רחבה וחסכונית יותר.
במסגרת הפרויקט אישי אני בוחן נושאים כמו:
• יצירת פרסונות שונות עם העדפות והתנהגויות מגוונות
• סימולציה של תגובות לקוחות להצעות ערך, מחיר ומיתוג
• זיהוי התנגדויות, רגשות ודפוסי קבלת החלטות
• השוואה בין תובנות של AI לבין משוב אנושי אמיתי
• בחינת רמת העקביות, ההטיות והאמינות של התוצאות
וכאן אני נתקל בשאלה הגדולה ביותר של הפרויקט:
עד כמה זה באמת מדויק?
לא רק מבחינת תשובות "נכונות", אלא האם התגובות מספיק מציאותיות, מגוונות, ויכולות לנבא התנהגות צרכנית אמיתית.
זהו פרויקט שנמצא בתהליך, ואני מאמין שיש כאן פוטנציאל משמעותי לעולמות של מחקר שוק, מוצר, שיווק וקבלת החלטות.
אשמח לשמוע מאנשי מוצר, דאטה, שיווק ומחקר:
האם הייתם סומכים על קבוצת מיקוד מבוססת AI?
Ideas (0)
Not yet ideated.
Jul 16, 13:54
linkedin_author_expansion
data
low
33.2
new
לימדו אותנו לסמוך על האינטואיציה שלנו. שקר. אינטואיציה זה מה שיש לך אחרי מנה שווארמה ב-2 בלילה. בדאט
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/or-ben-haimmm_%D7%9C%D7%99%D7%9E%D7%93%D7%95-%D7%90%D7%95%D7%AA%D7%A0%D7%95-%D7%9C%D7%A1%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%9A-%D7%A2%D7%9C-%D7%94%D7%90%D7%99%D7%A0%D7%98%D7%95%D7%90%D7%99%D7%A6%D7%99%D7%94-%D7%A9%D7%9C%D7%A0%D7%95-%D7%A9%D7%A7%D7%A8-activity-7476996581909561344-nakV?utm_source=combined_share_message&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAGgymj8BRYvwSJ_ah8Gf5Lt2SZlSs63CG6w
This post highlights how intuition is the enemy of accurate data analysis, using Bayesian thinking to avoid falling for deceptive funnels like fake TikTok ads. For Sibonix, the lesson is to never trust surface-level campaign metrics or initial assumptions at face value. We must train our systems and analysts to actively search for the single hidden data point that can completely change a campaign's projected success.
Read full content
לימדו אותנו לסמוך על האינטואיציה שלנו. שקר. אינטואיציה זה מה שיש לך אחרי מנה שווארמה ב-2 בלילה. בדאטה, היא האויב הכי גדול שלך.
קחו את "בעיית מונטי הול" המפורסמת (כן, "עשינו עסק", לזקנים שבינינו). 3 דלתות, עז אחת, ואישה בשם מרילין ווס סוונט עם IQ 228 שאמרה: "תחליפו דלת, ההסתברות שלכם לזכות מזנקת". האינטואיציה של כולם צרחה "מה זה משנה, נשארו שתי דלתות, זה 50-50!". אלפי גברים עם תארים מתקדמים כתבו לה מכתבי זעם מתנשאים וקראו לה בורה. היא צדקה, כמובן.
קוראים לזה חשיבה בייסאנית. הרעיון המעצבן הזה שכשיש לך מידע חדש - אתה חייב לעדכן את ההסתברויות שלך.
השבוע כמעט נפלתי בזה בעצמי. קפצה לי בטיקטוק פרסומת להימורים ב-Polymarket. הכל נראה קל, נגיש, כסף על הרצפה. המוח שלי כבר התחיל לתכנן איזה צבע יהיה לפורשה. (כן, גם אני אנושי).
אבל אז חפרתי קצת פנימה. הבנתי שזה בכלל אתר חיצוני. מפוברק. הפקה שלמה שנועדה רק לייצר אשליה של ניצחון קל כדי לשאוב אותי פנימה לפלטפורמה האמיתית. ברגע שהמידע החדש הזה נכנס למערכת - ההסתברות מ-"אני הולך להתעשר" התרסקה ל-"אני הולך לממן לאיזה קריפטו-ברו חופשה בדובאי".
בתור Data Analysts, זה בדיוק התפקיד שלנו. לא להנהן כשמראים לנו נתון ראשוני שנראה טוב, אלא לחפש את הפרט הקטן הזה שמשנה את כל התמונה. לא להתאהב בהנחת המוצא שלנו, גם אם היא מרגישה סופר הגיונית.
מתי בפעם האחרונה נתון אחד קטן הרס לכם תיאוריה שלמה?
Ideas (0)
Not yet ideated.
Jul 16, 13:54
linkedin_author_expansion
data
low
33.2
new
כש NULL הוא לא באמת NULL אלא בעיית דאטה שמתחבאת מתחת לפני השטח
השבוע נתקלתי במצב מתסכל (בקטנה) : ש
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/or-ben-haimmm_sql-dataanalytics-dataquality-activity-7392525446476857344-qI4x?utm_source=combined_share_message&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAGgymj8BRYvwSJ_ah8Gf5Lt2SZlSs63CG6w
The post highlights a fundamental truth: even the most perfect SQL query cannot produce results if the underlying source data is missing. For Sibonix, this is a reminder to enforce strict data validation checks at the ingestion stage of our AI agent pipelines rather than wasting time debugging downstream queries. The concrete next step is to ensure our data systems verify source completeness before running analytical workflows.
Read full content
כש NULL הוא לא באמת NULL אלא בעיית דאטה שמתחבאת מתחת לפני השטח
השבוע נתקלתי במצב מתסכל (בקטנה) : שאילתת SQL החזירה ערכי NULL במקום נתונים שהייתי בטוח שקיימים.
עברתי על הסינטקס, בדקתי את את התנאים ואת הלוגיקה הכול נראה תקין. ובכל זאת, שום דבר לא עבד.
בשלב הזה החלטתי לעבוד בשיטת האלימינציה (תודה להכוונה מהגורם המתאים) לבודד כל חלק בקווארי, לבדוק כל עמודה וכל תנאי צעד אחר צעד.
וכשהגעתי לשורש הבעיה, הבנתי שהקוד בכלל לא היה העניין הדאטה עצמו היה חסר!!!!
זו הייתה תזכורת חשובה: גם הקווארי הכי מדויק לא יוכל לפצות .
לפני שמשפרים לוגיקה או מבנה של שאילתה, חשוב לעצור ולוודא שהמקור שעליו אנחנו עובדים אמין ושלם.
מסקנה : ולידציה של הנתונים היא לא שלב נלווה היא הבסיס לכל תהליך אנליטי רציני.
בתמונה נול אחר לא מה שאתם חושבים.
#SQL #DataAnalytics #DataQuality #ProblemSolving #LearningByDoing
Ideas (0)
Not yet ideated.
Jul 16, 13:54
linkedin_author_expansion
ai_marketing
medium
58.2
processed
הייתי בטוח שפיצחתי את השיטה. (ספוילר: לא פיצחתי כלום).
בניתי מטריצה שלמה. צבא קטן של סוכני AI שאמורי
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/or-ben-haimmm_%D7%94%D7%99%D7%99%D7%AA%D7%99-%D7%91%D7%98%D7%95%D7%97-%D7%A9%D7%A4%D7%99%D7%A6%D7%97%D7%AA%D7%99-%D7%90%D7%AA-%D7%94%D7%A9%D7%99%D7%98%D7%94-%D7%A1%D7%A4%D7%95%D7%99%D7%9C%D7%A8-%D7%9C%D7%90-activity-7477276170372190208-zY8T?utm_source=combined_share_message&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAGgymj8BRYvwSJ_ah8Gf5Lt2SZlSs63CG6w
This experiment proves that standard AI agents are too polite and linear to accurately simulate the chaotic, peer-influenced dynamics of a human focus group. For Sibonix, this is a warning not to sell basic multi-agent setups as a complete replacement for human market research. If we build synthetic focus groups, we must explicitly program agents to persuade, disagree, and change their minds dynamically rather than just reading from their prompt-defined scripts.
Read full content
הייתי בטוח שפיצחתי את השיטה. (ספוילר: לא פיצחתי כלום).
בניתי מטריצה שלמה. צבא קטן של סוכני AI שאמורים לייצר קבוצת מיקוד סינתטית. כל סוכן קיבל פרסונה, נקודת מוצא, דפוסי התנהגות. המטרה? לחסוך את הכאב ראש של להביא אנשים אמיתיים לחדר עם מראה דו-כיוונית ובורקס, ולתת למודלי שפה לעשות את זה מהר ובזול.
ואז הרצתי את הטסט מול דאטה של בני אדם אמיתיים (הבייסליין). ושם קלטתי את הפדיחה.
הסוכנים שלי היו יותר מדי... מנומסים. הם חשבו בצורה לינארית. כל סוכן נצמד לנקודת המוצא שלו כמו ילד טוב שמקריא מהדף. הם לא ידעו לחשוב עצמאית תוך כדי תנועה. אפס סטייה מהפרומפט.
ואז עצרתי ושאלתי את עצמי: רגע, ככה בני אדם מתנהגים בקבוצת מיקוד? הם פשוט יושבים, אומרים את דעתם ולא זזים ממנה מילימטר? או שיש שם כאוס, שכנועים, ומישהו שמשנה את דעתו רק כי ההוא לידו דיבר ממש בביטחון?
הדאטה שלי מראה ש-AI חושב לינארית. הוא לא יודע לזייף דינמיקה אנושית. אבל פה אני צריך אתכם, אנשי מוצר, UX ומחקר שיושבים בחדרים האלה: מה באמת קורה בדינמיקה של קבוצת מיקוד אנושית? (חוץ מהבורקס).
(תמונת בורקס מצורפת לרפרנס, כי עם כל הכבוד לטכנולוגיה, את זה מודל שפה עוד לא יודע לייצר).
Ideas (2)
Standard AI agent simulations lack peer-influence dynamics, resulting in polite, linear discussions where agents never change their minds or succumb to group pressure.
We will build a multi-agent debate simulation in LangGraph where each agent is assigned a dynamic 'conviction score' (1-10) in their state. We will run a comparative test on a new product positioning angle, showing a side-by-side run of a standard agent group (which remains stagnant) versus our dynamic group, where a highly confident agent successfully persuades others to update their conviction scores and change their initial stance.
before_after_comparison
moderate
— Requires setting up a custom LangGraph state machine with 3-4 agents, tracking their internal conviction variables, and logging the output JSON.
Simulating chaotic, non-linear human focus groups requires agents to have explicit persuasion thresholds and social susceptibility parameters rather than just static system prompts.
We will build a Streamlit dashboard that visualizes a synthetic focus group discussing a controversial ad creative in real-time. The screen recording will show a live line chart tracking the 'group consensus index' as a simulated skeptic agent's defense breaks down under the influence of two enthusiast agents.
screen_recording
substantial
— Requires building a Streamlit frontend, integrating it with an asynchronous OpenAI assistant thread, and mapping real-time sentiment analysis to a chart.